Cellphone Radiation Hazards
The biggest news story of the year, is not anything to do with the economy or the state of the Nation; but the die-off of wildlife around the world. I was unaware of the magnitude until I read this article which has collated all the known animal die-offs over the last year and a half. Since November 6th 2009, there have been over 60 mass die-offs of fish, birds and mammals. Some of the most dramatic examples of die-off are: 1000’s of octopuses wash up on a beach in Portugal, 1/3/11, Thousands of Redwing blackbirds fall from the sky in Beebee, Arkansas, 1/2/11, 10,000 dead birds in Manitoba, Canada, 1/4/11, 8000 turtledoves fall from the sky in Faenza, Italy on 1/8/11, Millions of crickets wiped out in Port Allen, Louisiana, 1/12/11, 10,000 Cattle and Buffalo die in Vietnam, 1/21/11, hundreds of Penguins dying in New Zealand, 1/22/11, and 12,000 dead antelope in Kazakhstan, 5/28/10.
Now most of these deaths are in the U.S. and a great deal are in the southeast part co-inciding with the Gulf Oil Spill. Are they a result of the use of Corexit dispersal agent, still being used in the Gulf? That might explain some of the mass fish die-offs; but how do you explain birds dropping from the sky en masse, with organs that are imploded from the inside? That sounds like the HAARP project; the immense micro-wave antennae array in Alaska. It has been alleged that specific species or individuals can be targeted with HAARP frequencies similar to a radio receiving a signal from a radio station. Each human being or animal species emits a specific frequency that can be tuned into, if that signal strength is strong enough; it can interact with aluminum particles in the body to heat the tissue to the point where it implodes.
Now in the United States, Aluminum is put in most processed foods and in skin care products such as deodorant. There is no good reason why Aluminum is in food, unless it was being used in conjunction with Micro-wave technology as a form of modification of human consciousness. The HAARP project is a mind control device on a grand scale. Blanketing the world with Chemtrails on a daily basis with Aluminum and barium creates a grid in the ionosphere that allows for microwave transmissions to bounce off the ionosphere and blanket the world. All Organisms that contain large amounts of aluminum will react to tranmissions in the microwave range. In this respect wireless communications become a part of the matrix that controls human consciousness. In the cafe that I am currently sitting in, there are over 30 wireless signals that are running through my body and of course there is my cellphone that I seem to be always jabbering away on, much ado about nothing…
Now, Why am I not sick? I live in an urban environment with no connection to nature and am immersed in a sea of discordant frequencies from the crazy thoughts of 6 million people to all these wireless microwave transmissions. The principle of Alchemy is turning dark into light or negative into positive. As one progresses on the spiritual path, they become coherent; that is they begin to harmonize all discordant frequencies. Energy is just energy, if you have a lot of it; even negative energy it can be used as a source of power. Coherence is the organization of energy into a unified pattern. Unity consciousness is a sign of an evolved consciousness. We become balls of energy that emit frequencies as well as absorb. It is possible to turn all of these discordant frequencies that are meant to limit and control your life into a fuel source to free oneself from the very thing that is limiting you. In the film the matrix, Morpheus tells Neo that when he is ready, not only will he not have to run from the agents that they will be under his dominion and rule.
Orgone is one of those tools to turn dark into light, create coherence in discordant energy patterns including all forms of microwave transmissions. How do I know that this is actually happening? Little tests have shown me over the years that Orgone creates coherence. One is the cellphone test that has shown that orgone attached to a cellphone can actually increase the growth rate of plants. So what do I do? Rather than changing my habits of talking on the cellphone for 3-4 hrs a day; I add a Orgone cellphone chip to my phone and a Matrix neutralizer as a form of overkill. I use technology to help advance my consciousness and increase my health at the same time. I could go live in the mountains and eat berries wear a loincloth, pound my chest above the evils of modern society or I can adapt to my environment and modify to my advantage. Another experiment that shows that Orgone creates coherence is the one with razor blades. I place my razors on an Orgone disc in my bathroom that extends the life of my razor blades up to 90 days of use without replacement. This of course saves me a bit of coin, but it also re-in forces the idea that Orgone creates coherence. The orgone electricity experiment that I was running a few years ago has shown that there can be savings of over 25% on average with some as high as 50%.
I currently have a pumpkin from the beginning of October that is still kicking that sits under my Christmas tree that is still young and virile. My apartment is immersed in a sea of orgone so the pumpkin will most likely stick around to the spring again. The Christmas tree will go with the snow, life cut short, tis the way of things. The re-enforcement creates a positive feedback loop that increases the effectiveness of the Orgone; because at the end of the day; Orgone really is a mind amplification device. The more I believe I can walk on water, the greater the likelihood that I create miracles or quantum effects in my life. The process of creating coherence has continued with the introduction of the Unified Energy technologies of the Ascensionenergyprogram, where one thing ends and another begins, I know not. It has all become just one big energy signature.
The Mayan Calendar predicts big happenings this year. Johan Calleman even claims the calendar ends on November 28th, 2011 rather than the December date of 2012. The time acceleration phenomena anticipates many major changes in the world this year such as a return to Sovereign political systems and and a Sound money system backed by precious metals. It does not seem possible that so many changes can take place in such a short time frame, but who would have predicted the fall of the Egyptian dictatorship in a weekend that has been running for over 30 years. As we speak, protesters sit side by side on top on tanks calling for the removal of Mubarak. The typical repressive response of NWO order countries has not happened and the military has stepped back for a moment and sided with the people. A new event perhaps in the annals of governments. Egypt of course is the cradle of civilization and now it has changed to something new, overnight. Iraq appears to be on the verge of a similar renaissance as the collapse of the de facto government in the United States may occur by the spring right along with the predictions of the Mayan calendar. Over the summer, I would go up to Cairo, New York and hang out with Preston Nichols of the Montauk Project fame and use his sound system that creates quantum effects. His property sits atop a under-ground pyramid complex in Greene county in upstate New York. Co-incidence or an act of creation? Freedom is a thought-form, like anything else and when the frequency hits a certain amplitude the manifestation becomes visible in the external world. If you have not tried the Ascensionenergyprogram, I urge you to give it a try at least until the end of the spring, we are in momentous times and these technologies are their to aid you in the spiritual awakening process and the road to happiness.
On a more mundane note, I am discontinuing the line of Alchemia Nova products, because of the disappearance of the Alchemist Raoul Tollman for three months now. I am offering a discount of 25% on his gem elixirs. There are some items, that I am out of, you can call me or email me, if you would like to know what I have left. I am also running a special on Orgone cellguards, buy two get one free. I am raising the last of the money needed for the elusive dotto ring, the RF Magnetic frequency device designed for Age Reversal and the re-growth of the telomeres. This has been a project that has been on-going now for the last 5 years. I have reached the final hurdle, I have a new engineering company and we have made excellent modifications to the original prototype that I had running two years ago. I will be adding the dotto ring to the Ascensionenergyprogram.com, it will be included in the price of a regular subscription, so if you are already on the program, there is nothing you need to do. The device is designed to be used in person, but it can also be used remotely. It makes a very large dynamic magnetic field that is similar to an enhanced gravity field.
Over and Out- Kevin
PLATINUM MATRIX CELLPHONE RADIATION NEUTRALIZER
It is well known that an electromagnetic field (EMF) is a particular form of matter through which electrically charged particles can interact. Physically, the existence of EMF is due to a time-variant electrical field E giving rise to a magnetic field H, and due to a time-variant magnetic field H giving rise to a curl electric field: both the components E and H are changing constantly and excite each other. The EMF of fixed or uniformly moving charged particles is inextricably entwined with them. When charged particles are accelerated, the EMF is “detached” from them and starts to exist independently as electromagnetic waves which do persist even if their source is turned off (for example, radio waves do not disappear when the antenna emitting them is de-energized).
Electromagnetic fields are characterized by a wavelength ? (lambda). A source that generates the radiation-and, essentially, producing electromagnetic oscillations-is characterized by a frequency f (see Fig. 1).
Extensive research into the effect of electromagnetic fields on the human organism traces back to 60s of the 20th century.
A wide array of clinical evidence has been accumulated for the unfavorable effect of magnetic and electromagnetic fields on the human body. Some medical doctors proposed a new nosological name: radiowave sickness or microwave sickness. Later on, researchers from Russia and other countries found out, first, that the human nervous system is particularly sensitive to EMF, and second, that EMF can exert a so-called information effect on humans if the intensity of the EMF is lower than a thermal effect threshold. It is generally agreed that the nonthermal or information effect is induced at a relatively low level of EMF (for example, for radio frequencies higher than 300 MHz, this level is lower than 1 mWatt/cm2).
EMF can exert various kinds of influence on biological objects including humans: continuous and intermittent, general and local, multiple from several sources and combined with other unfavorable environmental factors, etc.
The biological response depends on the following parameters of EMF:
•Rate of Exposure
The nervous system is one of the most EMF-sensitive systems in the human organism. EMF of low intensity can cause malfunctions in a nervous cell, in a synapse (a structure responsible for transmitting nervous impulses), or in other particular nervous structures. Persons who are in contact with EMF can experience changes in their higher nervous activity and memory. Also, such persons have a disposition to develop stress reactions. Some structures of the cerebrum are highly sensitive to EMF. Under the influence of EMF the pituitary-adrenal system is stimulated, increasing the content of adrenalin in blood and activating the blood coagulation processes. The hypothalamus-hypophysis-adrenals system is recognized one of the systems which have an early involvement in the human organism’s natural response to environmental factors.
The nervous system of a human embryo is particularly sensitive to EMF. Also, ample evidence shows that EMF can exert a negative effect on the immunologic reactivity of the human organism. The results of investigations suggest that under the influence of EMF, immunogenesis processes are impaired and depressed. Besides, it was found that in animals exposed to EMF, the development of an infectious process is aggravated. Autoimmunity is thought to be related to a pathology of the immune system rather than to some changes in the antigenic tissue structure. As a result, the immune system manifests itself as an antagonist to normal tissue antigens. An impairment of the sexual function in turn is usually related to changes in its regulation by the nervous and neuroendocrine systems. Also, repeated exposure to EMF depresses the activity of the pituitary gland. It is known that exposing a pregnant woman to EMF can cause congenital malformations in children. A fetus is most vulnerable at early pregnancy periods corresponding to the implantation stage and the early organogenesis stage.
When an organism is exposed to EMF for many years, the biological effect of EMF can accumulate, sometimes causing remote consequences, including degenerative diseases of the central nervous system, and hormonal and oncologic diseases.
In recent years there has been evidence that EMF can trigger the so-called resonance effects in biological objects and that certain forms of modulation of EMF can be of importance in bioeffects. It was found that there are the so-called frequency and amplitude windows, which have a high biological activity at the cellular level as well as at the level of the central nervous system and the immune system. Also, there is evidence that people give an inadequate pathological response to modulated EMF.
Cellular communication systems are an example of how EMF can affect the human organism.
The cellular radiotelephony is now one of the most intensively developing telecommunication systems. At the moment more than 800 million people worldwide use this kind of mobile communication. And the number of active users increases each year.
The main components of a cellular communication system include: base stations (BS) and mobile radiotelephones (MRT). Base stations communicate with mobile radiotelephones, and so both the BSs and the MRTs are sources of electromagnetic radiation in the UHF (ultrahigh frequencies) range.
Base stations radiate an electromagnetic energy in the range from 463 to 1880 MHz, depending on a communication standard.
A mobile radiotelephone is a miniature radio transmitter. Transmission is performed in the frequency range from 453 to 1785 MHz, depending on a product standard. The power of the radiation emitted by a mobile radiotelephone is a variable and to a much degree depends on the state of the communication channel “mobile-radiotelephone/base- station”-that is, the higher the level of the BS’s signal at the site of signal reception, the lower the power of the MRT’s radiation. The maximal power ranges between 0.125 and 1 Watt; however, in reality it usually does not exceed 0.05-0.2 Watt.
The electromagnetic radiation emitted by a mobile telephone is received not only by the base station receiver but also by the user’s body-primarily the user’s head. When one talks by a mobile telephone, changes in the bioelectric activity of his brain are so considerable that they can be called a local electromagnetic storm. Figure 2 shows the changes in the spectrum of the human electroencephalogram before and during a talk by a mobile telephone (figures a and b respectively).
According to statistical data:
•to restore the resources the human organism spends on a talk by a mobile telephone, it takes as many as ten times more time, as a minimum, than the talk itself
•talking by a mobile telephone more than 2-3 hours a week causes functional changes in the human organism
•using a PC monitor for a long time every day during 6-8 years can lead to a pathological impairment of the vision, the central nervous system, the cardiovascular system, and the immune system
Over many years, attempts have been made to create screens and devices to reduce the negative effect of man-caused electromagnetic fields. However, no real protection of the user from the electromagnetic radiation emitted by household appliances, computer equipment, and radiotelephones, to say nothing of more intense kinds of man-caused radiation, has been created to the present day.
The spectral characteristic of the bioelectrical activity of the human brain: before a talk by a mobile telephone (a), during a talk (b), and during a talk by a mobile telephone with the Aires Neutralizer applied to it (c).
All the aforesaid was the reason for developing the Aires Electromagnetic Abnormalities Neutralizer.
According to the theoretical and experimental research conducted by G. Melnikov, head of the Laboratory for Fractal Optics of the Vavilov State Optical Institute, the Aires Neutralizer is a passive fractal-matrix resonator which is a universal spatial-wave Fourier filter capable of analyzing oscillations of any kind of electromagnetic field (background, man-caused, biological, etc.) into harmonic components. The underlying active structure of the Aires Neutralizer is a passive fractal-matrix resonator made on a crystalline silicon wafer. The width of the line used in the fractal topology is about one µ, which enhances, by several orders of magnitude, the efficiency of the resonance interaction occurring in the area where electromagnetic oscillations are generated.
A variant of a fractal filter, and the spatial-wave structure that is produced by a beam of electromagnetic energy transmitted through it.
An electromagnetic pulse passing through the matrix filter activates a special fractal field-a “quantum crystal”-producing a phenomenon of diffraction in a transmitted reflected flux. As a result, a more harmonious and ordered background space is generated in the active area. Thus the passive interaction between a man-caused electromagnetic background and the matrix Neutralizer scheme makes it possible to efficiently correct field abnormalities and to improve structural characteristics of space over a wide spectral range.
At the department of electron-ion and vacuum technology, the department of microelectronics, and the department of microradioelectronics and technology of radio equipment of the St. Petersburg State Electrotechnical University, Russia, an investigation into a technique for ion magnetron sputtering of submicron copper films on silicon substrates with the use of the fractal matrix Aires Neutralizers was undertaken. The technique for magnetron sputtering-which employs the effect of emission of neutral atoms from the surface of a cathode that is bombarded by an ion flux generated in the plasma of a working gas discharge produced in a diode ion sputtering system in a flux of spirally moving electrons and under the action of the cyclotron effect that is provided by a system of permanent magnets-allows a film to grow on the substrate as a near ideal replica of its structure.
The experimental investigation was conducted with the use of a magnetron sputtering installation based on a standard vacuum plant ???-4.
Optically polished silicon wafers, type 76 ??? 7.5 and orientation <100>, were used as subjects under investigation. The Aires Neutralizers of electromagnetic radiation were used as fractal matrix resonators. The latter are built around a silicon chip (microcircuit) AIRES01, AIRES02, or AIRES03 (?? 6339 029 07598199 2001) manufactured by the Angstrem Corp. with the Aires technology. The microcircuit presents a silicon crystal of size 7.5×7.5 mm, and bears fractal matrix topology which is a geometrically synthesized artificial hologram consisting of lines of size, as of now, 1.0 µ.
The following results were obtained in the experimental investigation: the films produced with the use of the neutralizers had a well-defined and varied cluster-like structure.
At the periphery of a sample, circular structures were noted to form. When moving from the periphery toward the center of a wafer, the circular structures were noted to increase in diameter, and a gradation of elements from small to larger ones was observed. In the area of the central spot, there were large circular structures whose walls in some cases were as high as several microns. It should be pointed out that circular formations localized in the central spot were of a considerably more complicate structure than those in the peripheral zone. In the internal space of the elements localized in the central zone, germinal grains were found, arranged like a matrix. Outside these large circular structures, circular elements of varying diameter were observed, both isolated ones and those interweaving in a complicate structure. The general picture was a complex fractal structure consisting of several levels of self-organization and self-similarity.
When increasing the time of sputtering, and consequently the width of the film, small circular elements picturing a fractal structure emerged. Thus large circles were surrounded by smaller ones which in turn form a certain ordered circular structure, and so on.
When moving from the edge to the center, a level gradation of the fractal object was clearly visible owing to the large width of the film. Besides the planar geometry described above, all of the elements had a dome-shaped structure. Among them, such constructions as three-, four-, and six-sided cut “quasipyramids” were seen, surrounded by similar smaller structures.
The investigations that demonstrated the efficiency of the Aires Neutralizer were carried out by Doctor of Biological Sciences S. V. Zenin at the Clinical Experimental Research Center for Traditional Methods of Medical Diagnostics and Treatment. The experiments conducted under the guide of V. I. Slesarev, Doctor of Chemical Sciences, Professor of the St. Petersburg State Academy named after I. I. Mechnikov, revealed that by structuring a background electromagnetic field, the fractal “quantum crystals” can change the physical and chemical properties of water.
Interest in ordinary water derives from its biological importance and valuable structural and information properties. It is well known that the human organism consists of water by 62 per cent, which in turn are involved in every biochemical reaction occurring in the organism. Of course, the quality of water clusters is of crucial importance in the synthesis of adequate biomolecular compounds which are essential for the vital activity of humans.
Water is an open, dynamic and structurally-complex system. Its stationary state is easily disturbed by any outside action, causing the system to pass into a transition state characterized primarily by a change in the structural-information property of water. Due to self-organization, the system can either resume its original state or pass into another stationary state. Energetically, all possible states of molecules in pure water are virtually indistinguishable, because the differences do not exceed the value of the energy of the thermal (Brownian) motion of water molecules and their associates. This is indirectly evidenced by high dynamic properties of H2O molecules in liquid water. The entropy factor is important in characterizing the “unstructured” part of water because of great disorder in the movement and interaction of its molecules and their associates. And the information factor matters in characterizing the “structured” part of water because of some organization in the structure of water clusters as well as in their movements and exchanges of water molecules. The notion “information” is considered as a measure of organization of the movement (interaction and migration) of particles in a system.
The structure-information property of water is an ability of water molecules to form clusters whose structure encodes information about interactions which have occurred or are occurring in a given sample of water.
The structure of clusters is noteworthy. One of the elementary cells of water clusters is a tetrahedron involving four or five H2O molecules which are bound by hydrogen bonds (a volume-centered tetrahedron). Each of water molecules in a simple tetrahedron retains an ability to from hydrogen bonds. By these bonds, simple tetrahedrons can combine through their vertices, edges, and sides to form various clusters of a complex structure which can contain voids. Water clusters can be structurally similar to crystals of carbon, silicon or their compounds, because the H2O molecule is able to form four hydrogen bonds, while the above elements four covalent bonds. So the structure of water clusters can be similar to the structure of diamond, graphite, fulleren, and various silicate-anions. Thus the crystalline lattice of ordinary ice (lh), much like graphite, has a hexagonal structure, while ice (1c), much like diamond, has a cubical structure. In both the cases the crystalline lattice is made up of tetrahedrons.
According to quantum-chemical calculations, in water clusters a proton (H+) can migrate, by a forwarding mechanism, between the oxygen atom and the hydrogen atoms due to the interaction between covalent bonds and hydrogen ones, which leads to a delocalization of the proton within the cluster. This suggests that water clusters can be considered as polyproton systems. The proton delocalization contributes to the stability of the cluster, so the enlargement of clusters will increase their stability-however, not to infinity, but to some critical dimensions. According to the available data, such clusters can include from 50 to 1000 water molecules, depending on the cluster structure. Under the effect of the thermal motion, large clusters can dissociate into smaller ones. The latter, acting as germs, can spontaneously combine into larger clusters, replicating the structure of the maternal one. Besides clusters of critical dimensions, there are smaller clusters in the system at any time, whose lifetime is shorter. Both large clusters and small ones in the “structured” water are constantly exchanging water molecules with the “unstructured” water-that’s why they are called “twinkling clusters.”
Thus, water receives information communicated by various outside actions. In doing this, water encodes information by means of the structure of clusters forming at the moment, and changes the values of its structure-information index. Because clusters now form, now dissociate, ordinary water always contains an average statistical quantity of clusters of varying structure, no one of them prevailing. In the “structured” water, the content of clusters having a structure determined by an outside structuring action is increased.
Aside from structure-information properties, water features the following peculiarities: Because of high polarity of water molecules, and extreme unsteadiness of transitions between water states, liquid and vaporous water is a source of superweak, and sometimes weak, electromagnetic radiation which is variable in intensity, direction, and frequency. The movement of water molecules between different states, such as single molecules, random associates, and clusters, serves as an oscillator of water radiation. “Structured” water, i.e., twinkling clusters, generates the least chaotic electromagnetic radiation. At present, this kind of radiation is registered, recorded, and used as an information field which is generated by twinkling water clusters. The characteristics of this radiation primarily depend on the structure and dimensions of clusters of “structured” water. However, the parameters of “unstructured” water do also affect this radiation.
The electromagnetic radiation emitted by water induces an electromagnetic field in the surrounding liquid and vaporous water, which gives rise to the formation and growth of water clusters with structure-information properties similar to those of the induction source. It is this phenomenon that causes the structuring of water when in contact with insoluble materials or EMF. In the first case, the induction source is the structured water layer that is on the surface of a material, and in the second case, it is, for example, the hydrate shell of a medical preparation, or the “structured” water of living systems.
The structure-information property of pure water and water systems are affected by phase transitions in water, temperature and pressure (especially at supercritical values), acoustic oscillations, and electrical, magnetic and electromagnetic factors.
According to investigations conducted by S. V. Zenin, the conductivity of water is drastically affected under the influence of the radiation emitted by a computer or a radiotelephone, which points to some kind of breaking of the structure of water. With the Aires Neutralizer, a considerable compensation (by a factor of five and more times) of the effect of a monitor or radiotelephone on the water conductivity can be observed.
In addition, investigations into the effect of an electromagnetic radiation source on the structure of the human encephalogram were carried out in the Pavlov Physiology Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences and at the St. Petersburg Municipal Hospital #20.
The bioelectric activity of the human brain presents an aggregate activity of nervous cells, nervous pathways, and the surrounding cells-but mostly the postsynaptic potentials. A synapse is a spot where information is transmitted from one cell to another. While interacting between one another, nervous elements each moment generate a certain pattern of electric oscillations that are produced at different points on the surface of the brain. These oscillations have a very low amplitude-of several tens of microvolt. The relationship between variations in the microelectric oscillations of the brain and variations in the internal and external medium of the human organism has long been established. As early as works by V. V. Pravdich-Neminsky (1925), the human brain was considered as not only emitter of electromagnetic oscillations, but a device which is sensitive to even minimal changes in a background electromagnetic field, and responds to these changes by shifts in its own activity.
In the bioelectric activity investigations, a 900/1800 MHz GSM-standard mobile telephone was used as a source of alternating EMF.
The main results of the investigations are shown in figures 2, 3, 4 and 5.
As was noted above, using a radiotelephone changes markedly the structure of the bioelectric activity of the human brain, causing a shift toward increasing high-frequency rhythms. This kind of changes are indicative of an intensification of activation processes in the human brain. Besides, the rhythms distribution pattern is disturbed. All this can lead to a disorganization of the activity of the entire brain.
Figure 2 shows the original distribution of amplitudes of bioelectrical activity waves of a volunteer’s brain, top figure (a). The volunteer exhibits a rather balanced pattern of bioelectric activity. However, even in such a balanced pattern, turning on a radiotelephone markedly disturbs the original rhythms distribution. This state persists for a long time, middle figure b. The use of the neutralizer during a talk by the radiotelephone helps to restore the picture of distribution of bioelectrical activity wave amplitudes in the volunteer’s brain closely to the original pattern, bottom figure (c).
Figure 3 shows both the aggregate rhythmotopogram and the rhythms power distribution over different ranges before a start of an examination of another volunteer.
Distribution of encephalographic rhythms power: aggregate distribution, right, and range distribution, left.
When turning on a radiotelephone, a pronounced asymmetry was noted in the distribution of the volunteer’s brain waves in the delta-, alpha-, and beta-ranges, which was represented by the volunteer’s aggregate rhythmotopogram (see Figure 4). When the Aires Neutralizer was applied to the electromagnetic radiation source, the original pattern of distribution of the volunteer’s bioelectric activity brain rhythms power was noted to restore virtually completely (Figure 5).
According to psychological testing, the use of the Aires Neutralizer helped not only to compensate the negative effect of a radiotelephone, but also to considerably normalize the general functional state of a volunteer.
Based on the above results, an attempt was made to neutralize “internal electromagnetic abnormalities” that occur when the brain functioning is disturbed in the case of a cerebral infarction. To treat patients, the Aires Neutralizers were applied to the frontal area of the head through the central line, to the articulation between the frontal and temporal bones on both the sides, and to the area of the mastoid processes of the temporal bone (behind the ears) on both the sides. The favorable effect of the Aires Neutralizer was noted as soon as in 30-40 minutes, which could be judged by the clinical state of the patients: partial restoration of speech, control of headaches, and a decrease of intracranial pressure were noted.
According to research presented in 2007 by the American Academy of Otolaryngology, cell phone radiation incrementally damages the inner ear, causing high frequency hearing loss. Those who talk an hour a day or more, sustain the most damage.(11) Youthful cell phone habituates will suffer major and irreversible hearing damage by the time they reach young adulthood.
Microwaves cause eye lens opacity similar to cataracts. In the 1970s, researcher Milton Zaret demonstrated that weak microwave fields cause debilitating subcapsular eye lesions, sometimes years after exposure.(12) Israeli researchers have confirmed that microwaves at cell phone intensities cause macro and micro damage to the entire visual system, including tiny bubbles that can form on the eye lens.(13) Dr. Om Gandhi at the University of Utah reported that the eye lens of a 10 year old child will absorb five times more cell phone radiation than an adult eye.(14) Metal-rimmed eyeglasses can absorb microwaves, then re-emit that radiation onto the eye surface.(15)
Brain scans show that microwave phone radiation penetrates deeply into a child’s brain.(16) Within minutes, cell phone microwaves can open the blood brain barrier, allowing albumin and other chemicals from tiny blood vessels to leak into sensitive brain tissues. This leakage causes irreversible oxidative stress and nerve tissue damage.(17) Brain hormones, including melatonin, dopamine, norepinephrine and thyroid stimulating hormone are disrupted by phone microwaves.(18) [Also serotonin; ergo, depression, etc. — PH]
In late 2007, Israeli experts announced that talking as little as 10 minutes on a cell phone triggers changes in brain tissues linked to abnormal cell division and cancer.(19) Phone microwaves are implicated in both eye and salivary gland tumors.(20) In 2006, studies by three European research groups reported an increased incidence of brain tumors in people who have used mobile phones for ten years or more. After 2000 hours of microwave phone exposure, kids face a 240 percent increased risk of developing brain malignancy.(21) If the 1.75 million 8 and 9 year olds who now use cell phones average only half an hour a day, they will be at high risk for radiation cancer in their teen years. Cancer is the number two cause of death for American children.
The public health catastrophe being unleashed by indiscriminate use of wireless phones is further brought into focus by a double-blind medical study completed in India in 2005 and published in the Indian Journal of Human Genetics.(23)
The study analyzed micronucleated cell damage in blood and buccal (mouth) tissues of people who use their cell phone one to 15 hours a day. The control group had never used cell phones at any time. DNA samples were coded and scored blind in strict protocol.
The test results of the “Indian study” are as stunning as the REFLEX work. The non cell phone users had an average of only four percent of their cells with DNA damage. The human body has a chance of meeting this moderate cellular reconstruction challenge, although every DNA repair operation carries with it a chance of error.
A whopping average of 39.75 percent of cells taken from mobile phone users showed DNA damage. The blood of one 24-year-old male revealed 63 percent micro-nucleated cells. He had used a cell phone for 1-2 hours per day for two years, the norm for millions of kids.
Within two minutes of microwave phone exposure, the electrical activity of a child’s brain is abnormally altered for up to one hour.(39) British radiation expert Dr. Gerald Hyland reported that cell phones which use repetitive, pulsing 2 Hz and 8.34 Hz frequencies can badly disrupt the delta and alpha stabilization process in a child’s developing brain.(40)
Dr. Hyland confirmed that cell phone energy can cause radical changes in human mood and behavior.(41) This is the case because microwaves at cell phone levels can unleash a cornucopia of radical damage to all parts of the brain, including the cortex, the hippocampus (memory center) and the basal ganglia. To wit:
• Scientists have demonstrated that cell phone radiation causes immediate blood flow changes in the brain, and also deregulates calcium efflux from brain cells, causing cell membranes to weaken and leak.(42)
• Researchers in Finland have shown that one hour of cell phone radiation causes brain cells to shrink, indicating permanent damage to cell structure as confirmed by REFLEX studies.(43)
• The Max Planck Institute in Germany reported that cell phones can blast heat spikes into the brain which may flash burn cell membranes to the boiling point of water. (44)
• British researchers have shown that weak microwave radiation can change the shape of brain proteins into formations resembling pathological fibrils associated with Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s Disease. (45)
• Swedish scientists demonstrated that cell phone radiation makes holes (lesions) in rat brains and they predict a wave of early-onset Alzheimer’s in young cell phone users. (46)
Could the past two decades of mass brain damage from wireless radiation be among the roots of our nation’s mental health crisis? ….. The Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection says that we may expect kids who use cell phones to suffer not only brain tumors and dementia, but also increased epileptic readiness and depressive mental illness.(47)
By Rebecca Camber
Fourteen people living within a mile of a mobile phone mast that emits one of the highest levels of radiation in the country have died of cancer.
Four of the deaths have been in a cul-de-sac yards from the site.
A further 20 residents have developed tumours in the last seven years, although they have survived.
Those living in the shadow of the mast have begun a campaign for its removal, claiming that it has caused a cancer hotspot. The Health Protection Agency is investigating.
Worried parents are refusing to take their children to the playing fields where the mast is sited for fear of damaging their health.
The mast was erected in 1995 on a disused water tower on the High Acres estate in Kingswinford, near Dudley, West Midlands.
But campaigners claim health problems started among the 700 residents of the estate when more antennae and dishes were added in 2001.
It serves four mobile phone operators.
Experts from the communications watchdog Ofcom, who carried out tests on the mast, say it has the highest radiation level of any phone mast site surveyed in England this year.
However, the radiation was still within UK safety guidelines.
Wendy Baggott, 52, who leads a protest group against the mast, which is only 200 yards from her home, said: ‘It feels like a threatening presence looming all over the neighbourhood.
‘Over the last seven years there have been 14 cancer deaths in the area. Four of those happened in this road. The wellbeing of the whole community is being affected.’
The retired NHS clinical auditor, whose husband Clive has twice contracted skin cancer, said: ‘It is a massive concern to us that there is a children’s play area so near to it.
‘Parents and grandparents around here won’t let their children go there because they are terrified they could get cancer.’
One resident, Michael Morris, died from a brain tumour in 2003 aged 57.
His widow Pamela, 61, said: ‘There have been so many people in the neighbourhood who have died of these cancers.
‘Michael used to take the dogs for walks up there by the tower and I wonder if it might have been that.
When these masts came I think it was when he started to go downhill.’
The 14 deaths have included Betty Genner, who was killed by ovarian cancer in 2003 aged 68, and Dorothy Day, 69, who died two years later from cancer.
Six months ago another woman succumbed to a brain tumour. All of them lived within a mile of the mast.
he Government insists mobile phone masts pose no threat to the public.
But some campaigners believe the radiation from masts could be powerful enough to change the composition of body cells, making them more susceptible to cancer.
An Ofcom spokesman said: ‘This is the highest level of exposure that we have recorded in England this year.
‘The tower recorded levels 5,000 times below the safe exposure limit. It was not an excessive level of radiation.
‘Other results around the country have been found to be around similar levels and this is well within the safety limit.’
A spokesman for Dudley Metropolitan Council said checks carried out on the mast showed the equipment was working properly.
A spokesman for the Health Protection Agency said: ‘No concerns have been raised by general practitioners or other local health services in the area about any greater than expected numbers or unusual cases of any serious illnesses.
By Sue Kovach
Every day, we’re swimming in a sea of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) produced by electrical appliances, power lines, wiring in buildings, and a slew of other technologies that are part of modern life. From the dishwasher and microwave oven in the kitchen and the clock radio next to your bed, to the cellular phone you hold to your ear—sometimes for hours each day—exposure to EMR is growing and becoming a serious health threat.
But there’s a huge public health crisis looming from one particular threat: EMR from cellular phones—both the radiation from the handsets and from the tower-based antennas carrying the signals—which studies have linked to development of brain tumors, genetic damage, and other exposure-related conditions.1-9 Yet the government and a well-funded cell phone industry media machine continue to mislead the unwary public about the dangers of a product used by billions of people. Most recently, a Danish epidemiological study announced to great fanfare the inaccurate conclusion that cell phone use is completely safe.10
George Carlo, PhD, JD, is an epidemiologist and medical scientist who, from 1993 to 1999, headed the first telecommunications industry-backed studies into the dangers of cell phone use. That program remains the largest in the history of the issue. But he ran afoul of the very industry that hired him when his work revealed preventable health hazards associated with cell phone use.
In this article, we look at why cell phones are dangerous; Dr. Carlo’s years-long battle to bring the truth about cell phone dangers to the public; the industry’s campaign to discredit him and other scientists in the field; and what you can do to protect yourself now.
Cell Phones Reach the Market without Safety Testing
The cellular phone industry was born in the early 1980s, when communications technology that had been developed for the Department of Defense was put into commerce by companies focusing on profits. This group, with big ideas but limited resources, pressured government regulatory agencies—particularly the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)—to allow cell phones to be sold without pre-market testing. The rationale, known as the “low power exclusion,” distinguished cell phones from dangerous microwave ovens based on the amount of power used to push the microwaves. At that time, the only health effect seen from microwaves involved high power strong enough to heat human tissue. The pressure worked, and cell phones were exempted from any type of regulatory oversight, an exemption that continues today. An eager public grabbed up the cell phones, but according to Dr. George Carlo, “Those phones were slowly prompting a host of health problems.”
Today there are more than two billion cell phone users being exposed every day to the dangers of electromagnetic radiation (EMR)—dangers government regulators and the cell phone industry refuse to admit exist. Included are: genetic damage, brain dysfunction, brain tumors, and other conditions such as sleep disorders and headaches.1-9 The amount of time spent on the phone is irrelevant, according to Dr. Carlo, as the danger mechanism is triggered within seconds. Researchers say if there is a safe level of exposure to EMR, it’s so low that we can’t detect it.
The cell phone industry is fully aware of the dangers. In fact, enough scientific evidence exists that some companies’ service contracts prohibit suing the cell phone manufacturer or service provider, or joining a class action lawsuit. Still, the public is largely ignorant of the dangers, while the media regularly trumpets new studies showing cell phones are completely safe to use. Yet, Dr. Carlo points out, “None of those studies can prove safety, no matter how well they’re conducted or who’s conducting them.” What’s going on here? While the answer in itself is simplistic, how we got to this point is complex.
Flawed Danish Study Reports Cell Phones are Safe
In December, 2006, an epidemiological study on cell phone dangers published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute sent the media into a frenzy.10 Newspaper headlines blared: “Danish Study Shows Cell Phone Use is Safe,” while TV newscasters proclaimed, “Go ahead and talk all you want—it’s safe!” The news seemed to be a holiday gift for cell phone users. But unfortunately, it’s a flawed study, funded by the cell phone industry and designed to bring a positive result. The industry’s public relations machine is working in overdrive to assure that the study get top-billing in the media worldwide.
According to Dr. George Carlo, the study, by its design, could not identify even a very large risk. Therefore, any claim that it proves there’s no risk from cell phones is a blatant misrepresentation of the data that will give consumers a very dangerous false sense of security.
“Epidemiological studies are targets for fixing the outcome because they’re observational in nature instead of experimental,” Dr. Carlo explains. “It’s possible to design studies with pre-determined outcomesthat still fall within the range of acceptable science. Thus, even highly flawed epidemiological studies can be published in peer-reviewed journals because they’re judged against a pragmatic set of standards that assume the highest integrity among the investigators.”
Key problems with the study are:
There are few discernable differences between who was defined as cell phone users and who wasn’t. Thus, people defined as exposed to radiation were pretty much the same as those defined as not exposed to radiation. With few differences, it’s nearly impossible to find a risk.
Users were defined as anyone who made at least one phone call per week for six months between 1982 and 1995. So any person who made 26 calls was a cell phone user and therefore considered exposed to radiation. Those with less than 26 calls were non-users. In reality, the radiation exposure between users and non-users defined in this manner is not discernable.
The “exposed” people used ancient cell phone technology bearing little resemblance to cell phones used today. The results, even if reliable, have no relevance to the 2 billion cell phone users today.
From 1982 to 1995, cell phone minutes cost much more than today and people used their phones much less. Thus there was very little radiation exposure.
During the study’s time frame, people likely to use their cell phones the most were commercial subscribers. Yet this highest exposed group, in whom risk would most easily be identified, was specifically excluded from the study.
There were no biological hypotheses tested in the study. It was therefore only a numbers game. Ignored were mechanisms of disease found in other studies of cell phone radiation effects, including genetic damage, blood-brain barrier leakage, and disrupted intercellular communication. The study did not discuss any research supporting the notion that cell phones could cause problems in users.
The study itself was inconsistent with cancer statistics published worldwide addressing the Danish population. This study showed a low risk of cancer overall, when in fact Denmark has some of the highest cancer rates in the world. This inconsistency suggested that something in the data does not add up.
The cell phone industry constantly guards its financial interests, but unfortunately, an unwitting public can be harmed in the process, says Dr. Carlo. “Industry-funded studies in many cases now produce industry-desired outcomes. By tampering with the integrity of scientists, scientific systems and public information steps over the lines of propriety that are appropriate for protecting business interests—especially when the casualty of the interference is public health and safety.”
To learn more about the dangers of cell phones and to read Dr. George Carlo’s full formal analysis of the Danish cell phone study, visit the Safe Wireless Initiative website at www.safewireless.org.
Lawsuit Prompts Safety Studies
In 1993, the cell phone industry was pressured by Congress to invest $28 million into studying cell phone safety. The cause of this sudden concern was massive publicity about a lawsuit filed by Florida businessman David Reynard against cell phone manufacturer NEC. Reynard’s wife, Susan, died of a brain tumor, and he blamed cell phones for her death. Reynard revealed the suit to the public on the Larry King Live show, complete with dramatic x-rays showing the tumor close to where Susan held her cell phone to her head for hours each day.
The next day, telecommunications stocks took a big hit on Wall Street and the media had a field day. The industry trade association at the time, the Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA), went into crisis mode, claiming thousands of studies proved cell phones were safe and what Reynard and his attorney said was bunk. TIA reassured the public that the government had approved cell phones, so that meant they were safe. The media demanded to see the studies, but, says Dr. Carlo, “The industry had lied. The only studies in existence then were on microwave ovens. At that time, 15 million people were using cell phones, a product that had never been tested for safety.”